Caloric Restriction: Difference between revisions

    From Longevity Wiki
    Line 30: Line 30:


    === Reduction of Oxidative Stress ===
    === Reduction of Oxidative Stress ===
    There are indications that oxidative stress is reduced by decreased food intake, thereby delaying primary aging. Primary aging is the process in cells and organs that defines the maximum lifespan in the absence of diseases (inevitable aging). Secondary aging is determined by external factors such as diseases, environmental factors, lifestyle, and physical activity (avoidable aging).<ref name="Tostlebe2005">M. Tostlebe: [http://d-nb.info/978638670/34 ''Disproportionalität der Aktivitäten der mitochondrialen Atmungskettenkomplexe im Myokard und in der Skelettmuskulatur im Alter.''] Dissertation, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 2005.</ref> Oxidative stress primarily occurs in the mitochondria, the powerhouses of the cells.<ref name="PMID19549533">PMID 19549533.</ref><ref name="PMID19634782">PMID 19634782.</ref> In some mouse strains, the effect of calorie restriction can be partially induced by [[Resveratrol]].<ref name="PMID 25824609">PMID 25824609.</ref> In yeasts, the protein ''Rim15'', a glucose-inhibited protein kinase, acts as a sensor of nutrient concentrations as well as the initiator of Meiosis and is necessary for lifespan extension in yeasts.<ref>PMID 24706810</ref> However, a meta-analysis also reported that caloric restriction – contrary to previous results – does not lead to lifespan extension in yeasts, but the results in yeasts are partly based on methodological artifacts.<ref>25071164</ref>
    There are indications that oxidative stress is reduced by decreased food intake, thereby delaying primary aging. Primary aging is the process in cells and organs that defines the maximum lifespan in the absence of diseases (inevitable aging). Secondary aging is determined by external factors such as diseases, environmental factors, lifestyle, and physical activity (avoidable aging).<ref name="Tostlebe2005">M. Tostlebe: [http://d-nb.info/978638670/34 ''Disproportionalität der Aktivitäten der mitochondrialen Atmungskettenkomplexe im Myokard und in der Skelettmuskulatur im Alter.''] Dissertation, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 2005.</ref> Oxidative stress primarily occurs in the mitochondria, the powerhouses of the cells.{{pmid|19549533}}{{pmid|19634782}} In some mouse strains, the effect of calorie restriction can be partially induced by [[Resveratrol]].{{pmid|25824609}} In yeasts, the protein ''Rim15'', a glucose-inhibited protein kinase, acts as a sensor of nutrient concentrations as well as the initiator of Meiosis and is necessary for lifespan extension in yeasts.{{pmid|24706810}} However, a meta-analysis also reported that caloric restriction – contrary to previous results – does not lead to lifespan extension in yeasts, but the results in yeasts are partly based on methodological artifacts.{{pmid|25071164}}


    ===Hormesis===
    ===Hormesis===

    Revision as of 16:24, 9 December 2023

    Caloric restriction (CR), a dietary regimen that reduces calorie intake without incurring malnutrition, has been a subject of scientific study in the context of aging and longevity. This practice is thought to extend lifespan and improve health outcomes in various species, including potentially humans.

    Effects in Model Organisms

    Positive Effects

    Effects of calorie restriction on the survival rate of laboratory mice (CR=Calorie Restriction).[1]
    Calorie restriction can significantly increase the lifespan of the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster).

    Calorie restriction has been studied in model organisms such as Yeast (Saccharomyces Cerevisiae)[2][3], Nematodes (Caenorhabditis Elegans)[4], Fruit Flies (Drosophila Melanogaster)[5], Mice (Mus Musculus)[1], Rats (Rattus Norvegicus)[6], Domestic Dogs (Canis Familiaris)[7] and Non-Human Primates.[8][9][10]

    In many species, not only is the average lifespan of the test animals increased, but also their maximum lifespan. The frequency of age-related diseases correspondingly decreases.[11] The effect of an increase in maximum life expectancy occurs in rodents both when starting the diet in the early life phase (1st to 3rd month), and in the middle life phase (12th month).[8][9] However, if calorie restriction is started in a later life phase of the test animals, such as in the 17th or 24th month of mice, the effect reverses and the lifespan of the test animals is shortened.[12]

    Both in a study with rhesus monkeys[13] by the American National Institute on Aging, and in a study on Drosophila[5], it has been suggested that life extension depends not only on calorie restriction but also on the composition of the diet.

    General Criticism

    Various findings raise doubts about the notion that caloric restriction slows down the aging process, delays the age-related decline in physiological fitness, or extends the lifespan of organisms from different phylogenetic groups.[14] Positive effects of caloric restriction are not universal:

    In fruit flies, positive effects of caloric restriction are not reproduced with careful control of nutrient fractions.[15]

    The increase in lifespan caused by caloric restriction is not even reproducible among different strains of the same species.[14]

    Calorie restriction does not extend lifespan in all mice. In the top graph, a significant effect is observed in C57BL/6 mice ("laboratory mice"), while it is absent in DBA/2 mice ("wild type") below (AL=ad libitum, CR=Calorie Restriction).[12]

    Thus, calorie restriction does not lead to lifespan extension in all mouse strains.[12] In 19 to 27% of the mouse strains studied, a 40% caloric restriction even resulted in a shortened lifespan.[16][17]

    The frequently used C57BL/6 mice tend to become overweight with unrestricted food access (ad libitum). In these animals, the effect of caloric restriction is significant. DBA/2 mice, on the other hand, remain lean even with ad-libitum feeding. In mice from this strain, caloric restriction does not lead to lifespan extension. DBA/2 mice consume more oxygen with the same energy intake than C57BL/6 mice, meaning their metabolic rate is increased – they are poorer "feed converters."[18] It was already observed in earlier experiments that caloric restriction is most successful in mice that gain significant weight in early adulthood.[19] The results of these studies are interpreted to mean that lifespan is more influenced by the balance of energy intake and energy expenditure. Only in test animals prone to overweight or obesity can caloric restriction cause lifespan extension.[20]

    The NIA study on rhesus monkeys found no lifespan extension.[13] In a long-term study conducted at the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center over a period of 20 years on rhesus monkeys, a significantly better health status and a significantly increased lifespan were observed in the group of animals that received a reduced food supply during this period. In this group, 80% of the animals were still alive, compared to only 50% in the normally fed control group. Furthermore, in the animals with calorie restriction, a significantly delayed onset of age-associated diseases such as diabetes, cancer, and brain atrophy, as well as cardiovascular incidents, was observed. The authors of the study conclude that calorie restriction delays the aging process in this primate species.[21][22]

    Mechanism

    The reasons for the lifespan extension in model organisms through caloric restriction are not yet fully understood. The underlying mechanism of this effect remains unknown. It's possible that the extension of lifespan results from improved health status due to the absence of obesity and the delayed onset of age-related diseases of the metabolic syndrome such as cardiovascular diseases and Type II Diabetes mellitus.

    Studies conducted with mice suggest that the lifespan extension associated with caloric restriction is not simply a result of leanness caused by calorie restriction. The maximum lifespan of male rats that maintained a low body fat mass through physical activity did not increase, but it did for mice that maintained a low body weight through caloric restriction alone, despite a sedentary lifestyle.[23]

    Caloric restriction in rats produces soluble factors in the blood serum that cause lifespan extension in human cell cultures.[24] Various mechanisms are being discussed:

    Reduction of Oxidative Stress

    There are indications that oxidative stress is reduced by decreased food intake, thereby delaying primary aging. Primary aging is the process in cells and organs that defines the maximum lifespan in the absence of diseases (inevitable aging). Secondary aging is determined by external factors such as diseases, environmental factors, lifestyle, and physical activity (avoidable aging).[25] Oxidative stress primarily occurs in the mitochondria, the powerhouses of the cells.[26][27] In some mouse strains, the effect of calorie restriction can be partially induced by Resveratrol.[28] In yeasts, the protein Rim15, a glucose-inhibited protein kinase, acts as a sensor of nutrient concentrations as well as the initiator of Meiosis and is necessary for lifespan extension in yeasts.[29] However, a meta-analysis also reported that caloric restriction – contrary to previous results – does not lead to lifespan extension in yeasts, but the results in yeasts are partly based on methodological artifacts.[30]

    Hormesis

    According to a contrary hypothesis, oxidative stress from reactive oxygen species (ROS) is thought to positively stimulate cell metabolism (Hormesis), which may explain the health benefits of caloric restriction as well as Fasting, oxidative plant compounds in cabbage vegetables, and physical training.[31]

    In contrast to the free radical theory, it is assumed that an increased formation of reactive oxygen species in the mitochondria, associated with caloric restriction, causes an adaptive response that enhances stress resistance.[32]

    Activation of Sirtuin-1 and Reduced Expression of the mTOR Receptor

    Signal-regulating enzymes such as Sirtuin-1 (Sirt1) in mammals, or Sirtuin Sir2 in yeasts, may play a role.[33] The cells of calorically restricted test animals produce Sirt1 in larger quantities.[34] An increased production of Sirt1, in turn, reduces the expression of the mTOR receptor (mammalian Target of Rapamycin),[35] which is also associated with the aging process. The lifespan of mice can be significantly extended by administering Rapamycin, which docks to the mTOR receptor.[36][37] Melatonin is also being studied due to its activation of Sirtuin.[28]

    "Reprogramming" of Metabolism and Gene Expression

    According to another theory, long-term reduced food intake "reprograms" the metabolism.[38] In mice under caloric restriction, a changed gene expression has been observed. On one hand, genes involved in energy metabolism are overexpressed,[39] while on the other hand, over 50 pro-inflammatory genes are downregulated.[40][41] It's possible that the regeneration of some stem cells is enhanced.[42] In some strains of mice, a similar effect can be induced by Metformin.[43]

    Increased Formation of Ketone Bodies

    Both caloric restriction and the ketogenic diet have therapeutic potential in various animal models of neurological diseases.[44] Under caloric restriction, there is a transition from glucose metabolism to the use of ketone bodies. Ketone bodies can be used as an alternative energy source for brain cells when glucose availability is poor.[45]

    Ketone bodies protect neurons against various types of neuronal injuries. This is one explanation for the beneficial effect of caloric restriction in the animal model of neurological diseases.[45]

    Increased Autophagy

    Autophagy, also known as “cellular self-digestion”, is a cellular pathway involved in the breakdown of proteins and organelles, and plays a role in various diseases. Dysfunctions in autophagy are associated with neurodegenerative diseases, microbial infections, and aging.

    Several indications suggest that autophagy is important for the effects of calorie restriction: The efficiency of autophagy decreases with age; the decline in autophagy is associated with changes in aging biomarkers; the age-dependent change in autophagy is prevented experimentally by calorie restriction; preventing a decrease in autophagy efficiency mimics the effects of calorie restriction; prolonged inhibition of autophagy accelerates the aging process; conversely, prolonged stimulation of autophagy delays the aging process in rats; stimulating autophagy can protect older cells from accumulation of altered mitochondrial DNA; stimulating autophagy alleviates age-related hypercholesterolemia in rodents.[46]

    A comparable effect was observed in plants whose lighting was reduced.[47]

    Reduced Thyroid Hormones

    Plasma levels of thyroid hormones Triiodothyronine (T3), Thyroxine (T4), and Thyroid-stimulating Hormone (TSH) were measured in Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) subjected to a 30% CR (caloric restriction) diet. The plasma T3 level decreased compared to the control group. Given the impact of the thyroid axis on metabolism, this could be a mechanism through which a CR diet mediates its health benefits.[48]

    Benefits of Caloric Restriction

    Research suggests that caloric restriction may offer several health benefits, including:

    • Improved metabolic health
    • Reduced risk of age-related diseases
    • Enhanced brain function and protection against neurodegenerative diseases
    • Possible extension of healthy lifespan

    Potential Risks and Concerns

    Caloric restriction, especially if not properly managed, can lead to:

    • Nutritional deficiencies
    • Loss of bone density
    • Reduced muscle mass and strength
    • Psychological challenges such as food obsession and social isolation

    Guidelines for Safe Practice

    Before starting caloric restriction, it is crucial to consult healthcare professionals. Some general guidelines include:

    • Gradual reduction in calorie intake
    • Emphasis on nutrient-dense foods
    • Regular monitoring of health parameters
    • Adjustment of diet based on individual health needs and lifestyle

    Conclusion

    While caloric restriction shows promise as a tool for extending healthspan and potentially lifespan, further research, especially in humans, is necessary. It is vital to approach this dietary regimen with caution and under medical supervision to avoid adverse effects.

    Todo

    • In fact, it has been shown that caloric restriction increases NAD+ bioavailability by activating the expression of NAMPT (nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase, which transforms nicotinamide [NAM] to NAD+ in the NAD+ salvage pathway) [49]

    References

    1. Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 Weindruch R et al.: The retardation of aging in mice by dietary restriction: longevity, cancer, immunity and lifetime energy intake. J Nutr 1986. (PMID 3958810) [PubMed] [DOI]
    2. Lin SJ et al.: Requirement of NAD and SIR2 for life-span extension by calorie restriction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 2000. (PMID 11000115) [PubMed] [DOI]
    3. Lin SJ et al.: Calorie restriction extends Saccharomyces cerevisiae lifespan by increasing respiration. Nature 2002. (PMID 12124627) [PubMed] [DOI]
    4. Lakowski B & Hekimi S: The genetics of caloric restriction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998. (PMID 9789046) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    5. Jump up to: 5.0 5.1 Mair W et al.: Calories do not explain extension of life span by dietary restriction in Drosophila. PLoS Biol 2005. (PMID 16000018) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    6. C. M. McCay und M. F. Crowell: Prolonging the Life Span. In: The Scientific Monthly 39, 1934, S. 405–414; JSTOR 15813.
    7. Lawler DF et al.: Diet restriction and ageing in the dog: major observations over two decades. Br J Nutr 2008. (PMID 18062831) [PubMed] [DOI]
    8. Jump up to: 8.0 8.1 Lane MA et al.: Caloric restriction and aging in primates: Relevance to humans and possible CR mimetics. Microsc Res Tech 2002. (PMID 12424798) [PubMed] [DOI]
    9. Jump up to: 9.0 9.1 Wanagat J et al.: Caloric intake and aging: mechanisms in rodents and a study in nonhuman primates. Toxicol Sci 1999. (PMID 10630588) [PubMed] [DOI]
    10. Weindruch R: The retardation of aging by caloric restriction: studies in rodents and primates. Toxicol Pathol 1996. (PMID 8994305) [PubMed] [DOI]
    11. Hofer T et al.: Long-term effects of caloric restriction or exercise on DNA and RNA oxidation levels in white blood cells and urine in humans. Rejuvenation Res 2008. (PMID 18729811) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    12. Jump up to: 12.0 12.1 12.2 Forster MJ et al.: Genotype and age influence the effect of caloric intake on mortality in mice. FASEB J 2003. (PMID 12586746) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    13. Jump up to: 13.0 13.1 Mattison JA et al.: Impact of caloric restriction on health and survival in rhesus monkeys from the NIA study. Nature 2012. (PMID 22932268) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    14. Jump up to: 14.0 14.1 Sohal RS & Forster MJ: Caloric restriction and the aging process: a critique. Free Radic Biol Med 2014. (PMID 24941891) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    15. Lee KP et al.: Lifespan and reproduction in Drosophila: New insights from nutritional geometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008. (PMID 18268352) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    16. Liao CY et al.: Genetic variation in the murine lifespan response to dietary restriction: from life extension to life shortening. Aging Cell 2010. (PMID 19878144) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    17. Rikke BA et al.: Genetic dissection of dietary restriction in mice supports the metabolic efficiency model of life extension. Exp Gerontol 2010. (PMID 20452416) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    18. Sohal RS et al.: Life span extension in mice by food restriction depends on an energy imbalance. J Nutr 2009. (PMID 19141702) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    19. Ross MH et al.: Dietary practices and growth responses as predictors of longevity. Nature 1976. (PMID 958413) [PubMed] [DOI]
    20. Life Extension: Myth of Caloric Restriction Refuted, https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/35192/Lebensverlaengerung-Mythos-der-Kalorienrestriktion-widerlegt
    21. Colman RJ et al.: Caloric restriction delays disease onset and mortality in rhesus monkeys. Science 2009. (PMID 19590001) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    22. rme: Template:Webarchive In: aerzteblatt.de, July 10, 2009.
    23. Fontana L & Klein S: Aging, adiposity, and calorie restriction. JAMA 2007. (PMID 17341713) [PubMed] [DOI]
    24. de Cabo R et al.: Serum from calorie-restricted animals delays senescence and extends the lifespan of normal human fibroblasts in vitro. Aging (Albany NY) 2015. (PMID 25855056) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    25. M. Tostlebe: Disproportionalität der Aktivitäten der mitochondrialen Atmungskettenkomplexe im Myokard und in der Skelettmuskulatur im Alter. Dissertation, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 2005.
    26. Csiszar A et al.: Anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory vasoprotective effects of caloric restriction in aging: role of circulating factors and SIRT1. Mech Ageing Dev 2009. (PMID 19549533) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    27. Skrha J: Effect of caloric restriction on oxidative markers. Adv Clin Chem 2009. (PMID 19634782) [PubMed]
    28. Jump up to: 28.0 28.1 Ramis MR et al.: Caloric restriction, resveratrol and melatonin: Role of SIRT1 and implications for aging and related-diseases. Mech Ageing Dev 2015. (PMID 25824609) [PubMed] [DOI]
    29. Nagarajan S et al.: Uncoupling reproduction from metabolism extends chronological lifespan in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014. (PMID 24706810) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    30. Huberts DH et al.: Calorie restriction does not elicit a robust extension of replicative lifespan in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014. (PMID 25071164) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    31. PMID 16242247.
    32. PMID 20350594
    33. Wang Y: Molecular Links between Caloric Restriction and Sir2/SIRT1 Activation. Diabetes Metab J 2014. (PMID 25349818) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    34. Cantó C & Auwerx J: Caloric restriction, SIRT1 and longevity. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2009. (PMID 19713122) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    35. Ghosh HS et al.: SIRT1 negatively regulates the mammalian target of rapamycin. PLoS One 2010. (PMID 20169165) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    36. Austad S: Recent advances in vertebrate aging research 2009. Aging Cell 2010. (PMID 20331443) [PubMed] [DOI]
    37. Harrison DE et al.: Rapamycin fed late in life extends lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice. Nature 2009. (PMID 19587680) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    38. Anderson RM & Weindruch R: Metabolic reprogramming in dietary restriction. Interdiscip Top Gerontol 2007. (PMID 17063031) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    39. Higami Y et al.: Adipose tissue energy metabolism: altered gene expression profile of mice subjected to long-term caloric restriction. FASEB J 2004. (PMID 14688200) [PubMed] [DOI]
    40. Higami Y et al.: Energy restriction lowers the expression of genes linked to inflammation, the cytoskeleton, the extracellular matrix, and angiogenesis in mouse adipose tissue. J Nutr 2006. (PMID 16424110) [PubMed] [DOI]
    41. Anderson RM et al.: Caloric restriction and aging: studies in mice and monkeys. Toxicol Pathol 2009. (PMID 19075044) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    42. Mazzoccoli G et al.: Caloric restriction and aging stem cells: the stick and the carrot?. Exp Gerontol 2014. (PMID 24211426) [PubMed] [DOI]
    43. Mulvey L et al.: Lifespan modulation in mice and the confounding effects of genetic background. J Genet Genomics 2014. (PMID 25269675) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    44. Maalouf M et al.: The neuroprotective properties of calorie restriction, the ketogenic diet, and ketone bodies. Brain Res Rev 2009. (PMID 18845187) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    45. Jump up to: 45.0 45.1 Lin AL et al.: Caloric restriction increases ketone bodies metabolism and preserves blood flow in aging brain. Neurobiol Aging 2015. (PMID 25896951) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    46. Minina EA et al.: Autophagy mediates caloric restriction-induced lifespan extension in Arabidopsis. Aging Cell 2013. (PMID 23331488) [PubMed] [DOI]
    47. Cavallini G et al.: Towards an understanding of the anti-aging mechanism of caloric restriction. Curr Aging Sci 2008. (PMID 20021367) [PubMed] [DOI]
    48. Roth GS et al.: Effects of dietary caloric restriction and aging on thyroid hormones of rhesus monkeys. Horm Metab Res 2002. (PMID 12189585) [PubMed] [DOI]
    49. Menssen A et al.: The c-MYC oncoprotein, the NAMPT enzyme, the SIRT1-inhibitor DBC1, and the SIRT1 deacetylase form a positive feedback loop. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012. (PMID 22190494) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]