Caloric Restriction

    From Longevity Wiki

    Caloric restriction (CR), a dietary regimen that reduces calorie intake without incurring malnutrition, has been a subject of scientific study in the context of aging and longevity. This practice is thought to extend lifespan and improve health outcomes in various species, including potentially humans.

    Science Behind Caloric Restriction

    Mechanisms

    Caloric restriction is believed to impact aging through several biological pathways. These include reduced metabolic rate, decreased oxidative stress, improved insulin sensitivity, and activation of cellular maintenance mechanisms such as autophagy.

    Research Findings

    Studies in model organisms, like yeast, worms, flies, and mice, have consistently shown lifespan extension with caloric restriction. Human studies, however, are more complex due to longer lifespans and ethical considerations.

    Effects in Different Organisms

    Effects of calorie restriction on the survival rate of laboratory mice (CR=Calorie Restriction).[1]
    Calorie restriction can significantly increase the lifespan of the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster).

    Similar experiments to those with mice have been conducted since 1934 with a variety of species under varied experimental conditions. In many species, not only is the average lifespan of the test animals increased, but also their maximum lifespan. The frequency of age-related diseases correspondingly decreases.[2] The effect of an increase in maximum life expectancy occurs in rodents both when starting the diet in the early life phase (1st to 3rd month), and in the middle life phase (12th month).[3][4] However, if calorie restriction is started in a later life phase of the test animals, such as in the 17th or 24th month of mice, the effect reverses and the lifespan of the test animals is shortened.[5]

    Calorie restriction has been studied in organisms such as Baker's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae),[6][7] the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans,[8] the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster,[9] Mice,[1] Rats,PubmedParser error: Invalid PMID, please check. (PMID: McCay1) Dogs[10] and non-human Primates.[3][4][11]

    Both in a study with rhesus monkeys[12] by the American National Institute on Aging, and in a study on Drosophila[9], it has been suggested that life extension depends not only on calorie restriction but also on the composition of the diet.

    Benefits of Caloric Restriction

    Research suggests that caloric restriction may offer several health benefits, including:

    • Improved metabolic health
    • Reduced risk of age-related diseases
    • Enhanced brain function and protection against neurodegenerative diseases
    • Possible extension of healthy lifespan

    Potential Risks and Concerns

    Caloric restriction, especially if not properly managed, can lead to:

    • Nutritional deficiencies
    • Loss of bone density
    • Reduced muscle mass and strength
    • Psychological challenges such as food obsession and social isolation

    Guidelines for Safe Practice

    Before starting caloric restriction, it is crucial to consult healthcare professionals. Some general guidelines include:

    • Gradual reduction in calorie intake
    • Emphasis on nutrient-dense foods
    • Regular monitoring of health parameters
    • Adjustment of diet based on individual health needs and lifestyle

    Conclusion

    While caloric restriction shows promise as a tool for extending healthspan and potentially lifespan, further research, especially in humans, is necessary. It is vital to approach this dietary regimen with caution and under medical supervision to avoid adverse effects.

       This article is a stub. You can help by expanding it.
    

    Todo

    • In fact, it has been shown that caloric restriction increases NAD+ bioavailability by activating the expression of NAMPT (nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase, which transforms nicotinamide [NAM] to NAD+ in the NAD+ salvage pathway) [13]

    References

    1. Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 Weindruch R et al.: The retardation of aging in mice by dietary restriction: longevity, cancer, immunity and lifetime energy intake. J Nutr 1986. (PMID 3958810) [PubMed] [DOI]
    2. Hofer T et al.: Long-term effects of caloric restriction or exercise on DNA and RNA oxidation levels in white blood cells and urine in humans. Rejuvenation Res 2008. (PMID 18729811) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    3. Jump up to: 3.0 3.1 Lane MA et al.: Caloric restriction and aging in primates: Relevance to humans and possible CR mimetics. Microsc Res Tech 2002. (PMID 12424798) [PubMed] [DOI]
    4. Jump up to: 4.0 4.1 Wanagat J et al.: Caloric intake and aging: mechanisms in rodents and a study in nonhuman primates. Toxicol Sci 1999. (PMID 10630588) [PubMed] [DOI]
    5. Forster MJ et al.: Genotype and age influence the effect of caloric intake on mortality in mice. FASEB J 2003. (PMID 12586746) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    6. Lin SJ et al.: Requirement of NAD and SIR2 for life-span extension by calorie restriction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 2000. (PMID 11000115) [PubMed] [DOI]
    7. Lin SJ et al.: Calorie restriction extends Saccharomyces cerevisiae lifespan by increasing respiration. Nature 2002. (PMID 12124627) [PubMed] [DOI]
    8. Lakowski B & Hekimi S: The genetics of caloric restriction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998. (PMID 9789046) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    9. Jump up to: 9.0 9.1 Mair W et al.: Calories do not explain extension of life span by dietary restriction in Drosophila. PLoS Biol 2005. (PMID 16000018) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    10. Shimizu N et al.: Constituents of seed of Malva verticillata. VII. Structural features and reticuloendothelial system-potentiating activity of MVS-I, the major neutral polysaccharide. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 1991. (PMID 1806283) [PubMed] [DOI]
    11. Weindruch R: The retardation of aging by caloric restriction: studies in rodents and primates. Toxicol Pathol 1996. (PMID 8994305) [PubMed] [DOI]
    12. Mattison JA et al.: Impact of caloric restriction on health and survival in rhesus monkeys from the NIA study. Nature 2012. (PMID 22932268) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]
    13. Menssen A et al.: The c-MYC oncoprotein, the NAMPT enzyme, the SIRT1-inhibitor DBC1, and the SIRT1 deacetylase form a positive feedback loop. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012. (PMID 22190494) [PubMed] [DOI] [Full text]