2021-12-27 - Interview Dr. David Sinclair - Huberman Lab Podcast - The Biology of Slowing & Reversing Aging
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9IxomBusuw&ab_channel=AndrewHuberman
- Interviewer: Andrew Huberman
- Length: 2:10:42
- In this interview, we discuss the cellular and molecular mechanisms of aging and what we all can do to slow or reverse the aging process. We discuss fasting and supplementation with resveratrol, NAD, metformin, and NMN. We also discuss the use of caffeine, exercise, cold exposure, and why excessive iron load is bad for us. We discuss food choices for offsetting aging and promoting autophagy (clearance of dead cells). And we discuss the key blood markers everyone should monitor to determine your biological versus chronological age. We also discuss the future of longevity research and technology. This episode includes lots of basic science and specific, actionable protocols, right down to the details of what to do and when. By the end, you will have in-depth knowledge of the biology of aging and how to offset it.
Transcript
- Welcome to the Huberman Lab podcast,
where we discuss science
and science-based tools
for everyday life.
I'm Andrew Huberman,
and I'm a professor of
neurobiology and ophthalmology
at Stanford School of Medicine.
Today, my guest is Dr. David Sinclair,
professor of genetics at
Harvard Medical School
and co-director of the
Paul F. Glenn Center
for the Biology of Aging.
Dr. Sinclair's work is
focused on why we age
and how to slow or reverse
the effects of aging
by focusing on the cellular
and molecular pathways
that exist in all cells of
the body and that progress
those cells over time from
young cells to old cells.
By elucidating the biology of
cellular maturation and aging,
Dr. Sinclair's group has
figured out intervention points
by which any of us indeed, all of us,
can slow or reverse the effects of aging.
What is unique about his work
is that it focuses on
behavioral interventions,
nutritional interventions,
as well as supplementation
and prescription drug
interventions that can help us all
age more slowly and reverse
the effects of aging
in all tissues of the body.
Dr. Sinclair holds a unique
and revolutionary view
of the aging process, which is that aging
is not the normal and natural consequence
that we all will suffer.
But rather that aging is a disease
that can be slowed or halted.
Dr. Sinclair continually publishes
original research articles
in the most prestigious
and competitive scientific journals.
In addition to that, he's
published a popular book
that was a New York Times bestseller.
The title of that book, is 'Lifespan:
Why We Age And Why We Don't Have To.'
He is also very active
in public facing efforts
to educate people on the biology of aging
and slowing the aging process.
Dr. Sinclair, and I
share a mutual interest
and excitement in public
education about science.
And so I'm thrilled to share
with you that we've partnered.
And Dr. David Sinclair
is going to be launching
the lifespan podcast,
which is all about the
biology of aging and tools
to intervene in the aging process.
That podcast will launch
Wednesday, January 5th.
You can find it at the
link in the show notes
to this episode today as well.
You can subscribe to that
podcast on YouTube, Apple,
or Spotify, or anywhere
that you get your podcasts.
Again, the lifespan podcast
featuring Dr. David Sinclair,
Claire begins Wednesday,
January 5th, 2022,
be sure to check it out.
You're going to learn a
tremendous amount of information,
and you're going to learn
both the mechanistic science
behind aging, the
mechanistic science behind
reversing the aging
process and practical tools
that you can apply in your everyday life.
In today's episode, Dr. Sinclair
and I talk about the biology of aging
and tools to intervene in that process.
And so you might view today's episode
as a primer for the lifespan podcast,
because we delve deep
into the behavioral tools,
nutritional aspects,
supplementation aspects
of the biology of aging.
We also talk about David's
important discoveries
of the sirtuins, particular components
that influence what is
called the epigenome.
And if you don't know
what the epigenome is,
you will soon learn in today's episode.
Coming away from today's episode,
you will have in-depth knowledge
about the biology of aging
at the cellular, molecular,
and what we call the circuit level,
meaning how the different
organs and tissues of the bodies
age independently, and how they influence
the aging of each other.
Today's episode gets into discussion
about many aspects of aging
and tools to combat aging
that have not been discussed
on any other podcasts
or in the book lifespan.
Before we begin, I'd like to
emphasize that this podcast
is separate from my teaching
and research roles at Stanford.
It is however part of my desire and effort
to bring zero cost to consumer
information about science
and science related tools
to the general public.
In keeping with that theme,
I'd like to thank the sponsors
of today's podcast.
Our first sponsor is ROKA.
ROKA makes eyeglasses and sunglasses
that are the absolute highest quality.
I've spent a lifetime
working on the visual system.
And I can tell you that the visual system
has to contend with a number
of different challenges,
such as when you move
from a bright area outside
to an area where there are shadows,
you have to adjust a number of
things in your visual system
so that you can still see things clearly.
One problem with a lot of
eyeglasses and sunglasses
is they don't take that
biological feature into account.
And you have to take off your
glasses and put them back on,
depending on how bright or
dim a given environment is.
With ROKA eyeglasses and sunglasses,
you always see things
with the utmost clarity.
In addition, they're very lightweight
and they won't slip off your face.
In fact, they were designed to be worn
while biking or running
and the various activities,
but they also have a terrific aesthetic,
so you could wear them to dinner or work.
I wear readers at night and when I drive
and I wear the sunglasses
for most of the day.
If you'd like to try ROKA
sunglasses or eyeglasses,
you can go to roka.com, that's roka.com
and enter the code Huberman,
to save 20% off your first order.
Again, that's ROKA, roka.com
and enter the code Huberman
at checkout.
Today's episode is also
brought to us by InsideTracker.
InsideTracker is a
personalized nutrition platform
that analyzes data from your blood and DNA
to help you better understand your body
and help you reach your health goals.
I've long been a believer in
getting regular blood work done
for the simple reason
that many of the factors
that impact your immediate
and long-term health
can only be assessed from
a quality blood test.
And now with the advent
of modern DNA tests,
you can also get a clear picture
of what your biological age is
and compare that to
your chronological age.
And obviously your biological
age is the important one
because it predicts how long you will live
and it's the one that you can control.
The great thing about InsideTracker
is that compared to a
lot of other DNA tests
and blood tests out there
is that with InsideTracker,
you don't just get your numbers back
at the levels of various
hormones, metabolic factors,
blood lipids, et cetera,
but it also offers clear
directives to lifestyle factors,
nutritional factors and
supplementation that you can use
in order to get the
numbers into the ranges
that are best for you and for your health.
If you'd like to try InsideTracker,
you can go to insidetracker.com/huberman
to get 25% off
any of InsideTracker's plans.
Just use the code Huberman at checkout.
Again, that's insidetracker.com/huberman
to get 25% off
any of InsideTracker's plans.
Today's episode is also
brought to us by Magic Spoon.
Magic Spoon is a zero sugar, grain-free,
keto friendly cereal.
Now I don't follow a
strictly ketogenic diet.
What works best for me is to eat according
to my desire to be alert
at certain times of day
and to be sleepy at other times of day.
So for me, that means
fasting until about 11:00 AM
or 12 noon most days.
And then my lunch is typically
a low carb, ketoish lunch,
maybe a small piece of grass-fed meat,
some salad, something of that sort.
And then in the afternoon,
I might have a snack
that's also ketoish.
And then at night is when
I eat my carbohydrates,
which for me helps me with
the transition to sleep
and allows me to get great deep sleep.
That's what works for me.
What that means is in the
afternoon I'm craving a snack.
And the snack for me is Magic Spoon.
What I do lately is I put
in some Bulgarian yogurt.
Sometimes I just eat it straight.
Each serving of Magic Spoon
has zero grams of sugar,
13 to 14 grams of protein
and only four grams of
carbohydrates in each serving.
So it really matches that
low carb ketoish approach.
There's only 140 calories per serving,
and they have a variety of flavors.
Coco, fruity, peanut butter or frosted.
I particularly like frosted
'cause it tastes like donuts.
I try not to eat donuts,
but I do love the frost.
And as I mentioned before,
I lately mix it with yogurt
polo cinnamon on there.
I'm getting hungry just talking about it.
Now, if you want to try Magic Spoon,
you can go to magicspoon.com/huberman
to grab a variety pack.
Use the promo code Huberman at checkout,
to get $5 off your order.
Again, that's magicspoon.com/huberman
and use the code Huberman to get $5 off.
And now my conversation
with Dr. David Sinclair.
Thank you for coming.
- Thanks for having me here.
It's good to see you.
- This is mate by the way, that
we're toasting at 11:00 AM.
Unlike other podcasts, we,
well, I don't drink alcohol,
so I'm boring that way.
But truly, thanks for being here,
I have a ton of questions for you.
We go way back in some sense,
but that doesn't mean that I don't have
many, many questions about
aging, longevity, lifespan,
actionable protocols to increase
how long we live, et cetera.
And I just want to start off
with a very simple question.
I'm not even sure there's an answer to,
but what is the difference
between longevity,
anti-aging and aging as a disease?
Because I associate
you with the statement,
aging is a disease.
- Right?
Well, so longevity is
the more academic way
we describe what we research.
Anti-aging is kind of the same thing,
but it's got a bad rap
because it's been used
by a whole bunch of people that don't know
what they're talking about.
So I really don't like
that term anti-aging,
but aging is a disease and longevity
are perfectly valid ways
to talk about this subject.
So let's talk about aging as a disease.
When I started my research,
disease here at Harvard Medical School,
it was considered,
if there's something
that's wrong with you.
and it's a rare thing,
it has to be less than
50% of the population,
that's definitely a disease,
and then people work their whole lives
to try and cure that condition.
And so I looked up,
what's the definition of aging
and it says, well, it's
a deterioration in health
and sickness and you can die
from it, typically you do.
Something that sounds
pretty much like a disease,
but the caveat is that if
more than half the population
gets this condition, aging,
it's put in a different bucket.
Which is first of all, that's outrageous,
'cause it's just a
totally arbitrary cutoff.
But think about this,
that we're ignoring the major
'cause of all these diseases.
Aging is 80 to 90% the cause
of heart disease, Alzheimer's.
If we didn't get old and
our bodies stayed youthful,
we would not get those diseases.
And actually what we're
showing in my lab is,
if you turn the clock back, in tissues,
those diseases go away.
So aging is the problem
and instead through,
most of the last 200 years,
we've been sticking band-aids on diseases
that have already
occurred because of aging
and then it's too late.
So there are a couple of things.
One is we want to slow aging down
so we don't get those diseases
and when they do occur,
don't just take a bandaid on,
reverse the age of the body
and then the diseases will go away.
- That clarifies a lot for me, thank you.
Can we point to one specific
general phenomenon in the body
that underlies aging?
- Yeah, well, that's contentious
because scientists like to
come up with new hypothesis.
It's how they build their careers.
But fortunately during the two thousands,
we settled on eight or
nine major causes of aging.
We call them hallmarks
'cause causes was a little bit too strong,
but these eight or nine causes,
at least for the first time
allowed us to come around
and talk together.
And we put them on a pizza
so everyone got an equal
weighting, equal slices.
But before that, by the way,
we were trying to kill
each other in the field,
that was horrible.
- Interesting that you guys work on aging
and you're trying to kill each other.
- Yeah, isn't it?
Well kill each other's careers.
Well I like to think
I was fairly generous,
but I was one of the kids
and the old guard really
didn't like the new guard.
We just came along in the 1990s
and said, free radicals don't do much.
They're actually genes
called longevity genes.
And that caused a whole ruckus.
And there was this competition
for what never happened,
which was a Nobel prize for this.
And it just led to a lot of competition.
I would go to meetings and
people would shout at each other
and backstab, it was horrible.
But then unfortunately
in the two thousands,
we rallied around this new map of aging
with these causes of hallmarks.
But I think that there's
one slice of the pizza
that is way larger than the others.
And we can get to that,
but that's the information in the cell
that we call the epigenome.
- Well tell us a little bit
more about the epigenome,
frame it for us if you will,
and then we'll get into ways
that one can adjust the
epigenome in positive ways.
- Yeah, so in science, what I like to do,
a reductionist is to boil it down
and I actually ended up boiling,
aging down to an equation,
which is the loss of
information due to entropy.
It's a hard thing to overcome,
second law of thermodynamics.
That's fair, but this
equation really represents
the fact that I think aging
is a loss of information
in the same way that
when you xerox something,
a thousand times you'll
lose that information
or you try to copy a cassette tape.
Or even if you send information
across the internet,
some of it will get lost.
That's what I think is aging.
And there were two types
of information in the body.
There is the genetic
information, which is digital.
ATCG the chemical letters of DNA,
but there's this other part of
the information in the body.
that's just as important,
it's essential, in fact,
and that's the systems
that control which genes
are switched on and off
in what cell at what time
in response to what we eat, et cetera.
And it turns out that 80% of
our future longevity and health
is controlled by the second part,
the epigenetic information,
the control systems.
I liken the DNA to the
music that's on a DVD
or a compact disc for the younger people.
We used to use these things.
- I recall.
- Yeah, and then the epigenome
is the reader that says,
okay, in this cell we need
to play that set of songs
and in this other cell,
we have to play a different set of songs.
But over time, aging is the
equivalent of scratching,
the CD and the DVD so that you,
you're not playing the
right songs and cells
when they don't hear the right songs,
they get messed up and
they don't function well.
And that is what I'm saying
is the main driver of aging.
And these other hallmarks
are largely manifestations
of that process.
- Can we go a little deeper
into what that these scratches are.
Is it the way that the DNA
are packed into a cell?
Is it the way that they're spaced?
What are the scratches
that you're referring to?
- So DNA is six foot long.
So if you join your chromosomes together,
you get a six foot post-sale.
So there's enough to go to
the moon and back eight times
in your body.
And it has to be wrapped
up to exist inside us,
but it's not just wrapped up willy-nilly.
It's not just a bundle of string,
it's wrapped up very carefully in ways
that dictates which genes
are switched on and off.
And when we're developing in the embryo,
the cell marks the DNA
with chemicals that says,
okay, this gene is for a nerve cell.
Your cell will stay a nerve cell
for the next a hundred
years, if you're lucky.
Don't turn into a skin
cell that would be bad.
And those chemicals,
there are many different
types of chemicals,
but one's called methylation.
Those little menthols will
mark which songs get played
for the rest of your life.
And there are other that change daily.
But in total, what we're
saying is that the body
controls the genome through
the ability to mark the DNA
and then compact some parts
of it, silence those genes,
don't read those genes and
open others, keep others open
that should stay open.
And that pattern of genes
that are silent and open,
silent, open, is what
dictates the cells type
the cells function.
And then the scratches are
the disruption of that.
So genes that were once
silent and you could say,
it's a gene that is involved in skin.
It's starting to come on in
the brain, shouldn't be there,
but we see this happen and vice versa,
the gene might get shut
off over time during aging.
Cells over time, lose these structures,
lose their identity,
they forget what they're supposed to do
and we get diseases.
We call that aging and
we can measure that.
In fact, we can measure it in such a way
that we can predict when
somebody is going to die
based on the changes in those chemicals.
- Are these changes, the
same sorts of changes
that underlie the outward
body surface manifestations
of aging, that most of
us are familiar with,
graying of the hair,
wrinkling of the skin,
drooping of the face.
Walking around New York lately,
it's amazing to me,
there are certain people
that seem to walk looking
down at the sidewalk
because their spine is
essentially in a C shape, right?
A hallmark, if you will, of aging,
that most of us are familiar with.
Are the same sorts of DNA
scratches associated with that?
Or are we talking about people
that are potentially
are going to look older,
but simply live longer?
- Well, it's actually, you
are as old as you look,
if you want to generalize.
So let's start with centenarian families.
These are families that
tend to live over a hundred.
When they're 70, they
still look 50 or less.
So it is a good indicator.
It's not perfect
because you can like me
growing up in Australia
and accelerate the aging of your skin.
But in general, how you look,
and no one's ever died from gray hair,
but overall you can get a sense
just from the ability of
skin to hold itself up,
how thin it is, the number of wrinkles.
A great paper just came out that said
that an AI System looking at the face
could very accurately
predict someone's age.
- Very interesting.
So I started off in
developmental neurobiology.
So one of the things
that I learned early on
that I still believe wholeheartedly
is that development doesn't
stop at age 12 or 15 or even 25
that your entire life is
one long developmental arc.
So in thinking about different portions
of that developmental arc,
the early portion of infancy,
and especially puberty, seem
like especially rapid stages
of aging.
And I know we normally
look at babies and children
and kids in puberty, and we
think, oh, they're so vital,
they're so young.
And yet the way you describe
these changes in the epigenome
and the way you have
framed aging as a disease
leads me to ask are periods
of immense vitality,
the same periods when we're aging faster.
- Yes, yes.
And this is something
I've never talked about,
at least not publicly.
So this is a really good question.
So those chemicals we can measure,
it's also known as the Horvath's clock.
It's the biological clock,
it's separate from your chronological age.
So actually what I didn't mention
is that when the AI looked
at the faces of those people,
they could predict their
biological age, their internal age.
So your skin represents the
age of your organs as well.
And the people that look after themselves,
we can talk about how to do that later.
But there are some people
that are 10, 20 years younger
than other people biologically
and it turns out if you
measure that clock from birth
or even before birth,
if you look at animals,
there's a massive increase
in age, based on that clock,
early in life.
So you're right, so that's
a really important point,
that you have accelerated aging
during the first few years of life,
and then it goes linear
towards the rest of your life.
But there's another interesting
thing that you brought up,
which is that we're finding that the genes
that get messed up, that get scratched
that are leading to aging
are those early developmental genes.
They come on late in life
and just mess up the system
and they seem to be
particularly susceptible
to those scratches.
So what's causing the scratches?
Well, we know of a couple
of things in my lab,
we figured out.
One is broken chromosomes, DNA damage,
particularly cuts to the DNA breaks.
So if you have an x-ray or a cosmic ray,
or even if you go out in the sun
and you'll get your broken chromosomes
that accelerates the unwinding
of those beautiful DNA loops
that I mentioned.
We can actually do this to a mouse.
We can accelerate that process
and we get an old mouse,
50% older, and it has
this bent spine kyphosis.
it has gray hair, it's organs are old.
So we now can control aging,
the forwards direction.
The other thing that accelerates aging
is massive cell damage or stress.
So we pinched nerves and we
saw that their aging process
was accelerated as well.
- Incredible, this is more
of an anecdotal phenomenon.
It is an anecdotal phenomenon,
but at this experience
of in junior high school,
going home for a summer and you come back
and then high school in the US
usually starts eighth or ninth grade,
or grade eight or grade
nine for you Canadians.
And then some of the kids,
like they grew beards over the summer,
or they completely matured
quickly over the summer.
Do you think there's any reason to believe
that rates of entry
into and through puberty
can predict overall rates of aging?
In other words, if a kid
is a slow burner, right?
They basically acquire
the traits of puberty
slowly over many years.
Can we make some course prediction
that they are going to live a long time
versus a kid that goes home for the summer
and comes back a completely
different organism
or appearing to be a
completely different organism.
Like they basically age
very quickly in the summer.
Does that mean they're
aging very quickly overall?
- Well, yeah, I don't
want to scare anybody.
- Sure.
- That there are studies that show
that the slower you take to
develop it also is predictive
of having a longer, healthier life.
And it may have something
to do with growth hormone.
We know that growth hormone is pro-aging.
Anyone who's taking growth
hormone, pay attention.
- Just look at someone
who's taking growth hormone.
- Yeah.
- They often will acquire these
characteristics of vitality,
like improved a smoothness of skin,
but their whole body shape changes often.
- Yeah, I mean you'll feel better
for a short amount of time.
You'll build up muscle, you feel great,
but it's like burning
your candle at both ends.
Ultimately, if you want to live longer,
you want less of that.
And the animals that have been generated
and mutants that have low growth hormone,
or sometimes these are dwarfs,
they live the longest by far.
A guy in my lab, Michael Bankowski,
he had the longest lived mouse,
a mouse typically lives
about two and a bit years.
He had a mouse that lived five years
and he gave it chloric
restriction, so fasting,
combined with one of
these dwarf mutations,
low growth hormone, I
think he called it Yoda.
You look at who lives the longest,
it's the really small people.
This is a bit anecdotal,
but it sounds like it might be true,
is that the people who
played the munchkins
in the Wizard of Oz, many
of them went on to live
into their nineties and beyond.
- Really?
- Yeah.
- Huh, amazing.
- And are there are some
Lauren dwarfs as well?
There are dwarf mutations in South America
and they seem to be protected
against many of the diseases of aging.
You barely ever see heart disease
or cancer in these families.
- So I having owned a
very large dog breed,
a bulldog Mastiff who lived
a long life for a bulldog,
11 years, but there are
many dogs that will live
12, 16 years that are smaller dogs.
Can we say that there's
a direct relationship
between body size and
longevity or duration of life?
- Well, there is, but that
doesn't mean that you're a slave
to your early epigenome
nor have to your genome.
The good news is that
the epigenome can change.
Those loops and structures can be modified
by how you live your life.
And so if you're born tall and I wasn't,
and I wished at the time I did grow,
but no matter what size you are,
you can have a bigger impact on your life
than anything your genes give you.
80% is epigenetic not genetic.
- So let's talk about some of
the things that people can do.
And I've kind of batch
these into categories
rather than just diving right
into actionable protocols.
So the first one relates to
food, blood sugar, insulin.
This is something I hear a lot about,
that fasting is good for us,
but rarely do I hear why it's good for us.
One of the reasons I'm
excited to talk to you today
is because I want to drill
into the details of this
because I think
understanding the mechanism
will allow people to make better choices
and not simply to just
decide whether or not
they're going to fast or not fast,
or how long they're going to fast,
I think should be dictated
by someone understanding
of the mechanism.
So why is it that having
elevated blood sugar,
glucose and insulin ages us more quickly
and or why is it that having
periods of time each day
or perhaps longer can extend our lifespan?
- Well, let's start with what
I think was a big mistake
was the idea that people
should never be hungry.
We live in a world now
where there's at least three meals a day,
and then we've got companies
selling bars and snacks
in between.
So the feeling of hunger,
some people never experienced
hunger in their whole lives.
It's really, really bad for them.
It was based, I believe
on the 20th century view
that you don't want to
stress out the pancreas
and you try to keep insulin
levels pretty steady
and not have this fluctuation.
What we actually found,
my colleagues and I,
across this field of longevity
is that when you look
at first of all animals,
whether it's a dog or a mouse or a monkey,
the ones that live the
longest by far 30% longer
and stay healthy are the ones
that don't eat all the time
actually was first discovered back
in the early 20th century,
but people ignored it.
And then it was rediscovered in the 1930s,
Claude McKay did Clark restriction.
He put cellulose in the food of rats,
so they couldn't get as many
calories even though they ate.
And those rats lived 30% longer,
but then it went away
and then it came back
in the 2000's in a big way,
when a couple of things happened,
one is that my lab and others showed
that there were longevity
genes in the body
that come on and protect
us from aging and disease.
The group of genes that I
work on are called sirtuins
there's seven of them.
And we show it in 2005 in a science paper,
that if you have low levels of insulin
and another molecule called
insulin like growth factor,
those low levels turn
on the longevity genes.
One of them that's really
important is called SIRT1.
But by having high levels
of insulin all day,
being fed, means your longevity
genes are not switched on.
So you're falling apart, your
epigenome, your information,
that keeps your cells
functioning over time,
just degrades quick.
Your clock is ticking
faster by always being fed.
Okay.
The other thing that I
think might be happening
by always having food around
is that it's not allowing the
cell to have periods of rest
and re-establish the epigenome.
And so it also is accelerating
in that direction.
There's plenty of other reasons as well,
that are not as profound,
such as having low levels
of glucose in your body
will trigger your major
muscles in your brain
to become more sensitive to insulin
and suck the glucose
out of your bloodstream,
which is very good.
You don't want to have glucose
flowing around too much,
and that will ward off type two diabetes.
- So hunger of course is
associated with low blood glucose
and low insulin.
Do you think there's anything
about the subjective
experience of hunger itself
that could be beneficial for longevity?
- Yeah, I do,
though you get used to
the feeling of not eating,
so I'm kind of screwed that way.
- It's like cold water,
you eventually adapt.
- You get used to it, unfortunately,
but there are some studies
that are being done
at the National Institutes of Health
that are able to simulate
the effect of hunger,
but still provide the calories.
And it's looking like
there's a small component
that's due to hunger, but most of it,
actually, is because
you've got these periods
of not being fed and then the body
turns on these defensive genes.
There's a really interesting experiment
that was published maybe
a couple of years ago
by Rafael de Cabo down at the NIH.
What he did was he took over 10,000 mice
and gave them different combinations
of fat, carbohydrate, protein.
And he was trying to figure out
what was the best combination.
And then you also cleverly had a group.
Well, two groups, one
that was fed all the time
or ate as much as they wanted
and the other group was only
given food for an hour a day.
And it turns out they ate
roughly the same amount of calories,
'cause of course in an hour
they're stuffing their faces.
It turns out it didn't matter
what diet he gave them,
it was only the group that
ate within that window
that lived longer and dramatically longer.
So my conclusion is,
and mice are very similar
to us, metabolically,
I think that tells us that
it's not as important,
what you eat, it's when
you eat during the day.
- What is the protocol
that people can extrapolate from that?
Or maybe I should just ask you,
what is your protocol for when to eat
and when to avoid food?
Do you fast, do you ever
fast, longer than 24 hours?
What do you do?
And what do you think is
a good jumping off place
if people want to explore
this as a protocol?
- Well, if there's one thing I could say,
I would say definitely
try to skip a meal a day,
that's the best thing.
- Does it matter which meal
or they're essentially equivalent?
- Well, as long as it's at the end
or the beginning of the day,
because then you add
that to the sleep period
where you're hopefully not eating.
- I think that that's an excellent point.
I realized it's a simple one,
but I think it's an excellent one
'cause I think one of
the things that people
struggle with the most
is knowing when and how
to initiate this so-called
intermittent and fasting.
And the middle of the day
obviously is not tacked
to the sleep cycle in the same way.
So it's much harder as
well for many people.
- Yeah, well, I'll tell you what I do.
I skip breakfast, I have a
tiny bit of yogurt or olive oil
because the supplements I have
need to be dissolved in it.
And then I go throughout the whole day,
as I'm doing right now, here
with this glass of water here,
I'm just keeping myself
filled with liquids.
And so I don't feel hungry,
be aware that the first
two to three weeks,
when you try that you will feel hungry
and you also have a habit of wanting
just to chew on something
that there's a lot of
physical parts to it,
but try to make it through
the first three weeks
and do without breakfast
or do without dinner
and you'll get through it.
And I did that most for
most of my life, actually,
mainly because I wasn't
hungry in the morning.
Some people are very hungry in the morning
and they may want to consider
skipping dinner instead,
but I will go throughout the whole day.
I don't get the crashes
of the high glucose
and the low glucose that anyone who goes,
oh man, it's three O'clock,
I'm going to need a sleep.
If you do what I do,
you will not experience that anymore
because what my body does
is it regulates blood
sugar levels naturally.
My liver is putting out
glucose when it needs to,
and it's very steady
and gives me pure focus
throughout the day.
And I don't have to even
have to think about lunch,
I'm just powering through.
At dinner, I mean, I love
food as much as anybody.
So I will eat a regular,
pretty healthy meal.
I'll try to eat mostly
vegetables, I can eat some fish,
some shrimp, I rarely will eat a steak.
In fact, my microbiome is
so adapted to my diet now,
if I eat a steak, it will
not get digested very well.
I'll feel terrible.
- If I don't eat a steak, I feel terrible.
[David laughs]
- Argentine lineage, but
we can talk about that
some other time.
- Well, everybody's different,
that's the other thing.
What works for me may
not be perfect for you
and we do have to measure
things to know what's working.
I rarely eat dessert, I
gave up dessert and sugar
when I turned 40 and occasionally
I'll steal a bit of dessert
'cause it doesn't hurt
if you steal it, right.?
But other than that I avoid sugar,
which includes simple carbohydrates,
bread, I try to avoid,
I've actually noticed,
this is just a side note.
I used to get buildup
of plaque pretty easily
and every time I went to the dentist,
they'd have to scrape it off.
And I even bought tools to scrape it off.
'cause it was driving me nuts.
I don't get pluck anymore
and I think it's because of my diet.
I don't have those sugars in my mouth
that the bacteria feed on
and then form the biofilm on the teeth.
Much better breath, by the way.
- That's a benefit.
Should you ever fast longer than this.
It sounds if you go to bed,
well, you used to tend to stay up late.
I know because I get texts from you
at like two in the morning my time,
which means you're out very
late and up early as well.
But assuming that people go to sleep
sometime around 1130 or
12, plus or minus an hour
and wake up sometime around 7:00 AM
plus or minus 90 minutes,
you're eating more or less on.
It sounds something like
a 20 hours of fasting,
four hours of eating
or 16 hours of fasting
and eight hours of food intake, et cetera.
But do you ever do longer fast,
like 48 hours or 72
hours a week long, fast?
- Occasionally I do.
So my typical day I would only
eat within a two hour window.
Just usually I'm either eating out or.
- 'Cause you're 22 too.
- Yeah, but I love well.
- And if you exercise,
do you feel like you,
then you just power through
and maintain that fasted state?
- Absolutely, I can exercise
and now I've already so used to it.
I don't feel like I need food
after exercising, I used to.
But have I gone longer?
Yes, but not very often.
I find it quite difficult
to go more than 24 hours.
But when I do it, maybe it's once a month,
I'll go for two days after
two and actually even better,
if you go for three days without eating,
it kicks in even greater
longevity benefits.
So there's a system called
the autophagy system,
which digests old and
misfolded proteins in the body.
And there's a natural cleansing
that happens when you're hungry.
Macroautophagy its name is
but a good friend of mine,
Ana Maria Cuervo at Albert
Einstein College of Medicine
discovered a deep cleanse
called the chaperone mediated autophagy,
which kicks in day two, day three,
which really gets rid
of the deep proteins.
And what excites me is you
just put out a big paper
that said, if you trigger
this process in an old mouse,
it lives 35% longer.
- [Andrew] Wow.
- Yeah, so it's a big deal.
If I could go longer, I would.
But I just find that with my lifestyle
and I'm going always
day, 110% I need to eat
at least once a day unfortunately.
- One more practical question
then a mechanistic question
related to this, the practical question
is when you are fasting,
regardless of how long,
I know you're ingesting fluids like water
and presumably some caffeine
I heard you had several
or more espresso today,
which is impressive,
but are you also ingesting electrolytes?
Like I know some people get lightheaded,
they start to feel shaky when they fast.
And that the addition
of sodium to their water
or potassium magnesium is something
that's becoming a little more invoke now.
Is that something that you do
or that you see a need for people to do?
- Well, it makes sense, but I
haven't had a need to do it.
So I don't, I drink tea
during the day and coffee
when I'm first awake and
I don't get the shakes.
So I don't fix what's not broken.
And I do add things to my protocol
that I think will improve
me and avoid those things
of course that wont.
But yeah, because I
don't have a need for it,
I don't try it.
But it does make sense,
especially if you've had a
big night the night before,
you'd probably want to
supplement with that.
But I think there's fair
amount of good stuff
in tea and coffee as it is.
- Okay, so then the
mechanistic question is,
you've told us that there's ample evidence
that keeping your blood sugar
low for a period of time
is 24 hours, can help
trigger some of these pro
longevity anti-aging mechanisms.
And that extending them
out two or three days
can trigger yet additional
mechanisms of gobbling up
of dead cells and things of that sort.
How is it that blood glucose
triggers these mechanisms?
Because we've said, okay, remove glucose
and things get better.
You've talked before maybe
we could talk more now
about some of the underlying
cellar and genetic mechanisms,
things like this are sirtuins,
but how our glucose in the sirtuins
actually tethered to one
another mechanistically.
- There's a really good question,
that proves you're a scientist
or a world-leading one.
So what we've now know is
that these longevity pathways,
we call them these longevity
genes, talk to each other.
And we used to say,
oh, my longevity genes is
more important than yours.
It was ridiculous.
'Cause they're all talking to each other,
you pull one lever and
the other one moves.
And the way to think of it is
that there are systems set up
to detect what you're eating.
So the sirtuins will mainly
respond to sugar and insulin.
And then there's this
other system called mTOR,
which is sensing how much
protein or amino acids
are coming into your body.
And they talk to each other,
we can pull one and affect
the other and vice versa.
But together when you're fasting,
you'll get the sirtuin
activation, which is good for you.
And you'll also through
lack of amino acids,
particularly three of them,
leucine, lysine and valine.
The body will down-regulate
mTOR and it's that up sirtuin,
down MTOR that is hugely beneficial
and turns on all of the body's defenses,
the pro chewing up the old proteins,
improving insulin sensitivity,
giving us more energy,
repairing cells, all of that.
And so these two pathways, I think,
are the most important for longevity.
- So interesting, you mentioned leucine,
within the resistance training
slash body building slash
fitness community.
Leucine gets a lot of attention
because there are long-standing debates
about how much protein one needs per day
and how much you want and
can assimilate at each meal.
It makes for many YouTube videos
and not much else, frankly.
However, it's clear that
because of leucine's effects
on the mTOR pathway, that
there are many people,
not just people in these
particular fitness communities
that are actively trying
to ingest more leucine
on a regular basis in order
to maximize their wellness
and fitness and in some
cases muscle growth
but also just wellness.
But what I interpret your
last statement to mean
is that leucine, because
it triggers seller growth
is actually pro aging in
some sense, is that right?
- Well, it could be that's
what the evidence suggests.
And again it goes back to the debate.
Should you supplement with
growth hormone or testosterone?
All of these activities will
give you immediate benefits.
You'll bulk up more.
You'll feel better immediately,
but based on the research,
it's at the expense of long-term health.
So my view of longevity,
the way I treat my body is
I don't burn both candles.
I have one end of the candle lit,
I'm very careful I don't blow on it,
but I also do enough exercise
that I'm building up my
muscle, but I'm not huge.
Anyone who's seen me,
knows that I'm not a
professional bodybuilder,
but I tried to actually, here's the key.
And I haven't said this
publicly, that I can remember.
I pulse things so that
I get periods of fasting
and then I eat, then I take a supplement,
then I fast, then I exercise
and I'm taking the supplements
and eating in the right timing
to allow me to build up muscle sometimes
because you can't just expect
to take something constantly
and do something
constantly for it to work.
And that's why it's
taken me about 15 years
to develop my protocol.
And there's a lot of subtlety to it.
- Yeah, it sounds like a
very rational protocol.
Does the name Ori Hofmekler
mean anything to you?
- No.
- Okay, just briefly, I
discovered Ori Hofmekler
about 15 years ago, he was
a in Israeli special forces.
He's now got to be close to 70.
Forgive me Ori, if that
number is inflated.
He wrote a book called 'The Warrior Diet',
which got very little
attention at the time.
But what he said was when he
was in Israeli special forces,
they rarely ate more than once per day.
And sometimes once every
second or third day.
And this is a guy who maintains
incredible physical stature,
he's very lean, very strong
and very vital at, I
wouldn't say an advanced age,
but he's getting up there
and he just seems to be
getting better and better.
Ori Hofmekler was the person
who essentially founded,
if you will, although
our ancestors founded,
to be completely fair,
the so-called intermittent fasting diet.
He called it the warrior diet
and this book didn't get much attention.
But one of the things that you just said
really reminded me of Ori.
I sat down with him, I
actually went to his home
and sat down with him and he
said, fasting is wonderful
but these pulses where
you nourish the body
or even slightly over nourish the body
provided they aren't too frequent,
have a tremendous effect on vitality.
And so I want to use
that as kind of a segue
to address this issue of
vitality versus longevity,
because here you're telling me
and certainly the evidence supports
that growth hormone will make
you feel better and younger
taking testosterone or estrogen,
we should probably say.
There are women who take
hormone therapies later in life
who take estrogen,
they experience a strong
increase in vitality
if it's done correctly, but
there is an effect of aging,
the body more rapidly,
it's sort of a second puberty if you will,
but this idea of restriction
and then pulsing,
not necessarily feast and famine,
but certainly famine and
feast in lowercase letters,
there really seems to
be something about that.
So at a cellular level,
we'd kind of go back to
mTOR and the sirtuins.
How do you think that the
cells might be reacting
to this kind of lowercased
feast and upper case famine
type protocol?
- Right, well, the pulsing, I
think is what you want to do
is to get the cells to
be perceiving adversity.
Okay, 'cause our modern
life we're sitting around,
we're eating too much,
we're not exercising.
Our cells respond.
They go, hey, everything's
cool, no problem.
And they become relaxed and their own turn
on their defenses and we age rapidly.
We can see it in the clock.
People who exercise and eat less,
have a slower ticking clock, it's a fact.
But my protocol is
different than most people's
because I am pulsing it.
Now, first of all, let's get to,
why did I even think
that might be possible?
'Cause I didn't read the warrior diet.
What I found in my research was that
if we gave resveratrol on
this red wine molecule,
that became well known in the 2000's.
If we gave it to mice,
their whole lifespan,
they were protected
against a high-fat diet,
which we call the Western diet.
They had lean organs.
They live slightly longer, but not a lot.
And if we gave them a high-fat
diet without resveratrol,
they actually lived a lot shorter.
So it resveratrol protected
them against the high-fat diet.
We gave it to them on a normal diet,
they just ate it when they wanted,
and there wasn't much effect.
This is what's not known though
it's in a supplemental data of the paper
that nobody ever reads.
The mice that were given
resveratrol every second day
on a normal diet live dramatically longer
than any other group.
- [Andrew] Interesting.
- So people out there, my
critics say, resveratrol
didn't extend the lifespan
of mice on a normal diet.
Therefore it's not aging,
it's just protecting
against a high-fat diet.
Well, look at the
supplemental data, please.
If you give it to the
mice every other day,
we had mice living over three years.
- Wow, that's a long time,
I have got many, many mice
in my owner ownership
at my lab at Stanford
and that's a very long life for a mouse.
- It was, by far.
And so it was a long life span extension.
And what that told me is that probably,
you don't want to be taking
a supplement every day.
You can take it either every other day
or give your body a rest.
And I do the same with my meals,
I rest during the day and then
I give a nutritious dinner
to my body and then give it
a rest, same with exercise.
And then I try to time it
because there are times
when I'm taking the drug
Metformin, which mimics low energy.
For those of you who don't know,
Metformin is a drug given
to type two diabetics
to bring down their blood sugar levels.
But it's been found that
looking at tens of thousands
of veterans and all those,
that those two type two diabetics
live longer than people
that don't even get type two diabetes.
So it's a longevity drug,
right now you have to get it
from your doctor in the US,
in most of the countries
you can just get it
over the counter and you protected.
It looks like, based on
epidemiological data, cancer,
heart disease for LT.
What else?
Dementia.
So I take Metformin.
- In addition,
you take Metformin end
fast fasting each day.
So when do you take it
relative to the fasting?
- Yeah, I always take
Metformin in the morning,
along with the resveratrol,
because for a number of reasons,
but mainly because my body responds better
and I've been measuring
my body for 12, 13 years.
But here's the thing, if I'm
going to exercise that day,
I will skip the Metformin.
And a lot of people who do pay attention
to this kind of thing,
think that they should
stop taking Metformin
'cause they're never going to get muscle,
or it's going to affect their
ability to build up muscle.
But that's not true, what
Metformin does to you,
it actually just reduces
your ability to have stamina
because it's inhibiting your
body's ability to make energy.
And so what happens is
when you're on Metformin,
you do fewer reps.
But guess what?
Those muscles that you
do build up on Metformin,
have the same strength and
have much lower inflammation
and other markers of aging.
You just won't have that
extra 5% size of muscles.
So if you want large muscles,
don't take Metformin and you'll be fine
during your exercise.
But for me, I'm not trying to get giant.
I want strong muscles
and I want to live longer
and healthier.
So I just try to time it
so that I get the most reps
out of my exercise regime,
but sometimes in scientific literature,
it's worth bringing this up.
If there's a 5% difference in a graph,
then either the press release
or some reporter will say,
oh my goodness, big difference,
5% contact Metformin during exercise.
That's the headline.
And then you go in and
it's barely significant.
And the graph is distorted
because they've changed
the axes to make it look bigger.
And now it's become a myth
that Metformin greatly inhibits
our ability to exercise,
which is not true, but in
an abundance of caution,
I skipped my Metformin on
days I'm going exercise.
And not only that,
I'm one of the 20% of people
that has a stomach sensitivity to it.
So if I'm not feeling great that day,
I don't take it either.
- You mentioned Metformin is available
only by prescription from a
doctor, at least in the US.
Berberine is a substance
that comes from Tree Barco.
I also learned about
many years ago from Ori.
He said, if ever, I'm going to overeat
like a Thanksgiving meal or something,
I take berberine, those were his words.
And I tried it and what's
remarkable about berberine
is that you can eat
enormous quantities of food
and not feel as if you've eaten
enormous quantities of food.
I'm not necessarily
recommending people do this.
But what I noticed was
if I took berberine,
which my understanding is
it works very similarly
to Metformin where some
of the AMPK pathway
and the mTOR pathway, et cetera,
that if I didn't ingest food
in particular carbohydrates,
I would feel a little dizzy
and kind of get a headache,
like almost hypoglycemic.
What are your thoughts on berberine
as an alternative to Metformin?
And are there any cautionary notes?
Obviously people should
talk to their doctor
before adding or subtracting
anything from their life,
including breath order,
anything that comes up,
but with all of that set aside,
what are your thoughts about berberine
and timing of low blood sugar
and these sorts of things?
- Right, well, before I
had access to Metformin,
I was taking berberine.
It's often known as the
poor man's Metformin.
- He just called me poor.
- Women can take it too.
So the thing with berberine
and we started it in my lab,
it is effective at boosting
energetics in the body,
just like AMPK and Metformin does.
And we've actually given
it to rats and mice
and seen that they are very healthy,
especially on a high-fat diet.
So I think it's likely to be good.
There are some human studies that exist,
clinical trials showing
that it increases insulin sensitivity.
You have to take high doses.
- Which is a good thing, right?
I think when people hear
insulin sensitivity,
sometimes people think,
oh, well that's bad, right?
No, but you want your cells
to be insulin sensitive.
You don't want a lot of
blood sugar floating around
that can't be sequestered into cells.
- Exactly, so this is
anti type two diabetes.
And so that this berberine
does have wonderful effects
on the metabolism of animals
and in some clinical trials
on dozens of people that's being tested.
Now, there's one cautionary
tale, which just came up,
Caenorhabditis lab
published that berberine
reduced the lifespan of worms,
but I'm not sure worms
trump human clinical trials
at this point.
- Not in my opinion,
no disrespect to my C. elegans colleagues
or rather my colleagues that work on C.
- Yeah, well, what I like to do
is to give all the information,
people can decide what they want,
but I would say based on the worm data,
I wouldn't panic just yet.
And I think berberine has been shown
to be really safe in humans.
- You mentioned resveratrol,
think now would be a great time
to talk a little bit about,
protocols for resveratrol,
great seed extract, et cetera.
Let's start with the obvious
one that I know you get a lot,
but for the record, can't
I just drink red wine
and get enough resveratrol, David.
- You can try, you need to
drink about 200 glasses a day.
- I'm sure it's been tried.
- There are some, and I drink
a glass of red wine a day
if I get the chance,
but any more than that,
it's a lot of calories and
your liver will get fatty
and it's all bad.
So, I mean, realistically,
you can only get the thousand milligrams
that I take a day from a
supplement that's pure.
Now there are a lot of
people selling resveratrol.
If it's not light gray or
white in color, throw it away.
The brown stuff has gone
bad or is contaminated.
And the contaminated stuff
beware it'll cause diarrhea.
But regular resveratrol
should not do that.
- So a thousand milligrams
per day is what you do.
- Yeah and I had for about 15 years now.
And you ingest that with
some fatty substance,
like olive oil or yogurt, is that right?
- Yeah, you have to, and other supplements
of course it's in curcumin.
These are crunchy things,
that is not going to get through your gut.
And I'm not just making this up.
I always base my statements
on human studies.
So we've done a lot of
studies on resveratrol
as have others since,
and we know that from,
we found out early, I was
one of the first people
to take a high dose for resveratrol.
And when we included it with food,
the levels in my blood went up five fold.
And so you want to have
something in there.
If you just drink it with water,
it's not going to get through.
And unfortunately, some people
have done clinical trials
without even thinking that they might need
to dissolve it in something.
- So are you taking this
all at once in the morning
and chasing it with some olive oil
or are you dissolving it in yogurt?
What's the specific protocol?
- Yeah, I've been improving perfecting
what I do for about 10 years
I would take some Greek yogurt,
a couple of spoonfuls, put
the resveratrol on there,
mix it around, make sure it's dissolved
and put that in my mouth and swallow that,
these days, what I like to do,
because I've realized that olive oil
and particularly oleic acid,
one of the mono unsaturated,
fatty acids is also an activator
of the sirtuin defenses.
So I'm trying to ingest
more of oleic acid.
So I switched to olive oil.
What I do is I put a couple
of teaspoons of olive oil
in a glass mix around the resveratrol,
and maybe some Coresatin
a similar molecule.
Make sure it's dissolved.
I put a little bit of vinegar
and if I have a basil
leaf, I'll put that in.
And it's like drinking
some salad dressing.
And it's very-
- Delicious, that raises a
question that I want to ask
before we get to NMN
and NR and vitamin B3,
which is by doing that,
do you think that it breaks your fast?
And I want to just frame this
question of breaking the fast
in a more general scientific theme.
And I'd love your thoughts on this.
One of the questions I
get asked all the time
is does ingesting blank break the fast,
does eating this or drinking this, coffee?
If I walk in the room and
someone else is eating a cracker,
does it break my fast?
People get pretty extreme with this,
my sense and please tell me if I'm wrong,
but my sense is that it
depends on the context
of what you did the night before,
whether or not you're
diabetic, lots of things.
So for instance, if I eat an
enormous meal at midnight,
go to sleep, wake up at 6:00 AM.
I could imagine that black coffee
or coffee with a little bit
of cream might quote unquote,
break my fast, but the body
doesn't have a breaking the fast switch.
The body only speaks in the
language of glucose, AMPK,
mTOR, et cetera.
So do you worry that
ingesting these calories
is going to quote unquote break your fast?
And more generally,
how do you think about the
issue of whether or not
you're fasting enough to
get these positive effects?
Because not everybody can manage
on just water or just tea,
or we should say not
everybody is willing to manage
on just water or just tea for
a certain part of the day.
- Well, my first answer is not scientific,
it's philosophical.
If you don't enjoy life, what's the point.
And so I'd like a cup of
coffee in the morning,
a little bit of milk, spoonful of yogurt,
it's not going to kill me.
Olive oil doesn't have protein
or carbs in it, not many.
And so I'm probably not affecting
those longevity pathways
negatively, but without that,
first of all, I wouldn't
enjoy my life as much.
Second, well, the olive
oil isn't is not as great
as the yogurt, but I'm trying to optimize
and there's no perfect
solution to what we're doing.
And we're still learning.
We don't know what's optimal for me,
let alone everybody else.
But I'm with you,
I don't believe that taking a couple
of spoonfuls of something,
unless it's high fructose corn
syrup is going to hurt you
because I've now got the rest of the day
till about eight, 9:00 PM
of not eating anything.
And that I forgive myself for that.
And that there's a really good point here.
You and I were discussing this earlier.
The point about doing this is
that you try to do your best.
If you go from regular living
to donate the whole day,
you're going to fail.
It's like quitting smoking, cold turkey.
It's easy to chew gum
and stick the patch on
because your body has to get
used to all sorts of habits.
And it's social, it's physical,
putting stuff in your mouth,
chewing, not just the
low blood sugar levels
and your brain will fight it.
Your limbic system is going to go,
hey, do it, do it, do it.
And you're going to have to fight it
but once you get through
it, you'll be better,
but you do it in stages.
Do breakfast first, then do small lunch
and then eventually cut lunch out.
Don't go cold turkey
because everyone knows.
It's a fact that if you
try to do a strict diet
right out of the gates,
they'll almost always fail.
- Now, I think that captures the essence
of the fasting rationally
and irrational approach
to supplementation very well,
along the lines of supplementation.
What about NMN, NR and B3, niacin?
How does one, I want to know what you do.
I also want to know what I should do,
and I think most people want
to know what they should do.
These are molecules that
impact the sirtuin pathway
impact the pathways that control aging
or rates of aging in the epigenome.
How do they do that?
And how does one incorporate that
into a supplementation protocol?
Should they choose to do that?
All right.
- Well, disclaimer is I
don't recommend anything,
but I talk about what I do.
So a bit of scientific background,
these are two in genes that we discovered
first in yeast cells when I was at MIT
and then in animals as I
moved to Harvard in the 2000's
one of my first post-docs,
actually literally my
first postdoc Haim Cohen,
published a great paper
just a couple of months ago
and found that turning
on the sirtuin six gene,
middle of the seven, number
six gene is very potent.
It extended the lifespan
dramatically of mice
that he engineered both males
and females, which is great.
So what you want to do
is so naturally boost
the activity of these sirtuins.
They are genes, but
they also make proteins.
That's what genes
typically make or encode.
And then those proteins
take care of the body
in many different ways as we've discussed.
So how do you turn on these
genes and make the proteins
they make even more active?
You want to rev up that system.
So exercise will do
it, fasting will do it.
What about supplementation?
Well, the first activator of
the sirtuins that we discovered
that acts on the enzyme
to make it do a better job
of cleaning up the body
and protecting resveratrol
We looked at thousands
of different molecules,
eventually tens of thousands.
And the one that was the best
was resveratrol in the dish.
And then we gave it to
little organisms, worms,
and then flies and
mice, eventually humans.
And we saw that it activated that enzyme.
So resveratrol is one way to activate it.
And you can think of it as the
accelerator pedal on a car.
It revs it up, but there's
something else that the sirtuins
need to work and that's NAD
and is a really small molecule,
little chemical in the
body that we need for life.
It's used by the body
for chemical reactions,
for a hundred different
reactions in the body.
And without it, you're dead
within seconds, you need NAD.
The problem that we've
seen is that NAD levels
decline as you become
obese, as you get older,
if you don't ever get hungry and the body
not only doesn't make enough of it,
it's chewing it up as well.
There's an enzyme called
CD38 that Eric Verdin
over at UCSF showed choose up.
Now he's now at the Buck
Institute in California,
choose up NAD as you get older.
So it's a double whammy.
You don't make as much and chew it up,
which is really bad because
what we've shown in my lab
and so have others is that NAD levels
are really important for keeping
those sirtuins and defenses
at a useful level.
And you can give a lot of resveratrol
but if you don't have the fuel,
you're basically accelerating a car
that doesn't have enough gas.
So you want to do both.
And that's what I do.
I take a precursor to NAD called
NMN and the body uses that
to make the NAD molecule in one step.
And so I know from measuring
dozens of human beings,
that if you take NMN for
the time period that I do,
I've been taking it for years.
But if you take it for about two weeks,
you'll double on average,
double your NAD levels in the blood.
Okay, that's not public information.
That's from clinical trials
that are not yet published
over the last two years.
There are other ways
to increase NAD levels
in someone like me, who's
getting older, I'm 52 now.
You can take NR, which
is used to make an amend,
which is used to make
NAD, and both NMN and NR
are sold by companies in the US.
NR is laxter phosphate,
the phosphate is a small
chemical the body needs.
You've probably heard
of the atom, phosphorus.
Let's go back one step.
How do you make NR?
NR gets made from vitamin B3, often.
You can also find it in
milk and other foods,
but sometimes people ask me,
why don't you just take vitamin B3?
And won't that just force
the body to make NAD?
And the answer is no, it
doesn't work very well.
We know this just by doing the experiment,
but the reason I think is is that NAD,
I said, it's a small molecule,
but relative to vitamin B3, it's big.
It's got those phosphates
on there, it's got a sugar,
it's got the vitamin B attached.
So you've got all these
components that come together
to make this very complicated
little molecule called NAD.
When you give NMN, it
contains all three components
that the body needs to make NAD.
If you give NR or just vitamin B3,
which is an even smaller molecule,
the body has to find
these other components
from somewhere else.
So where do you get phosphate,
well, the body needs it for
DNA, it needs it for bones.
So high doses of something
that requires additional phosphate
makes me a little concerned.
And we have compared to
NMN and NR head-to-head
in mouse studies, for instance in NMN,
we've shown in a cell
paper a few years ago,
makes mice run further, old
mice can run 50% further
'cause they had better
blood flow, better energy.
NR are at the same dose, did not do that.
In fact, it had no effect.
- I see, dosage wise, if
I were elect to take NMN
in supplement form to
increase my NAD levels
and presumably slow my aging,
how much NMN should I take?
What's the protocol that you do?
And are the various
forms that are out there,
are some better or some worse?
- Well, I'm always happy
to tell you what I do
and what my father does,
my 82-year-old father,
we take a gram of NMN every day.
- So it's a gram resveratrol
and a gram of NMN.
- Right.
- Okay a thousand milligrams.
- Now another important point,
which is, I'm not the
same as everybody else.
I have a different
microbiome, age, sex, right?
And so I've been measuring myself
and so I know if something's,
or I think I know if
something's making me better
or worse based on measuring
45 different things.
So I just want people to be aware
that what I do may not perfectly
or work at all for others,
but I have studied, as I said,
dozens of people who take NMN, at a gram,
sometimes two grams.
And I know by looking at all those people
that without any exceptions,
that if you do what I do,
your NAD levels go up by
about two fold or more.
And so I do that every day,
the thousand milligrams.
Now people sell it.
Now I never get into brands and all that.
First of all, I don't have
the time to measure products.
I don't know, though I should say,
I do want to say I'm working on a solution
for people to know what works
and what's real and what
isn't, but I'm not there yet.
And in the meantime, I would say,
if you do want to buy this,
let's say you want to buy NMN,
look for a company that
is well-established
that has high levels of quality control.
Look for three letters, GMP,
which is good manufacturing practices.
And so that means they make
it under a certain level
of quality control.
You're not going to find
iron filings in there
and it probably has the stuff
in it that they say it does.
But so that's all I can say right now.
I'm working on something that's
going to be much more helpful,
but overall, make sure it's
white, crystalline NMN,
and that to me, it tastes
like burnt popcorn.
- You crack open the capsules,
and you'll take a little sample
to make sure it tastes like burnt popcorn.
- Well, when I'm making
my capsules, I'll taste it
and I do a lot of quality
control on the stuff that I take.
- Do you take that gram all at once
with the resveratrol
or do you take it spread
throughout the day?
- It's all in the
morning for those things.
So if I take Metformin, it's NMN
and the resveratrol altogether.